On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Peter Kelly <pmke...@apache.org> wrote:
> > On 29 Apr 2015, at 9:46 pm, Gabriela Gibson <gabriela.gib...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > It may just be me, but I would not have looked in ooxml for docx > documents, > > but expected to find them in a docx directory. In ooxml I would have > > expected (wrongly) xml documents. > > > > With the symlink, it won't matter and it removes one small potential > > confusion. > > I’d advise against having symlinks in the repository since I don’t think > they are supported on windows. > > Oh. I had no idea :) The thing is though, when you do a web search for ooxml, the top link (at least in Ireland) is this: " Office Open XML (OOXML) is an XML-based file format used for representing word processing documents, spreadsheets, and presentations. It is conceptually similar to ODF in many respects, though a lot of the details differ.Jul 24, 2014 Office Open XML - Apache OpenOffice Wiki https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Office_Open_XML " So, by that definition, docx is not ooxml and ./dfconvert tells me that: $ ./dfconvert --help Usage: dfconvert get concrete.docx abstract.html Create a new HTML file from a Word document. The HTML file must not already exist. So, that makes me think that we should have docx and ooxml directories, but that docx should not live in ooxml? G
