On Sunday, August 23, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote:
> Abstentions are not to be discussed. Abstentions are abstentions. And > why discuss them in private? The [VOTE] was done here. There is no > private@ business called for. The only ballot that requires an > explanation is a -1. Private is used when people are involved, you know very well that there is a discussion about a person ongoing, which should not be done in public. > > Furthermore, I take personal exception to my abstention in the [PRE-VOTE] > being carried forward, effectively, against my wishes, and reported anyhow > when it is not applicable to this [VOTE]. That is unacceptable. Please > do not do that again. > I did NOT carry your vote forward, please look I did not write 1 0. I quoted a public email, which I think is legal, to explain why I did not carry it forward. Quoting public email is something we all do from time to time, it is pure nonsence to ask me not to do that. I even took care to copy/paste your exact wording. rgds jan i. > > - Dennis > > -----Original Message----- > From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org <javascript:;>] > Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2015 01:10 > To: dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org <javascript:;> > Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1 > > Hi > > I am pleased to announce that we can continue with our release. It has been > a long > journey so far and the next step is to have IPMC vote for the release. > > The vote passed with: > 8 +1 (include 1 Mentor vote) > 0 +0 (Dennis gave this in the PRE-VOTE, but wrote "I do not give permission > for this to be applied automatically to a genuine [VOTE]" so it is not > counted. > 0 -1 > > 4 PPMC abstained from voting (will be discussed later on private). > > Daniel Gruno and Myself have binding IPMC votes, which I will transfer. > > rgds > jan i. > > > On 20 August 2015 at 21:27, Dorte Fjalland <dortecasacon...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Regards > > Dorte > > El 20/8/2015 17:15, "Louis Suárez-Potts" <lui...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> escribió: > > > > > +1 > > > louis > > > > > > PS thanks for the reminder. > > > > > > > > > > On 18 Aug 15, at 14:06, jan i <j...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > > > We have found some errors during the PRE-VOTE phase, which made that > > > period > > > > very > > > > valuable instead of jumping direct to a VOTE. > > > > > > > > This is the call for the official VOTE for > > > incubator_corinthia_release_0.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/corinthia/incubator-corinthia_release_0.1.zip > > > > > > > > and the signature: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/corinthia/incubator-corinthia_release_0.1.zip.asc > > > > > > > > The vote we will follow the standard guidelines: > > > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > > > > "Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority > > approval > > > > <http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval> -- > > > i.e., > > > > at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release, and > > there > > > > must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be > vetoed." > > > > > > > > VOTE runs until Monday 23th August, where the IPMC VOTE will start. > > > > > > > > I invite our mentors to vote, since their vote count as IPMC. > > > > > > > > All IPMC who vote, please write if you do NOT want your vote to be > > > > transferred to the IPMC vote. > > > > > > > > rgds > > > > jan i > > > > > > > > Vote: > > > > [ ] +1, I agree in releasing the artifacts > > > > [ ] +0, I do not care if we release the artifacts > > > > [ ] -1, I do not want the artifacts to be release because .... > > > > > > > > > > -- Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
