> On 24 Aug 15, at 04:20, Peter Kelly <pmke...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Thoughts?

I love policy and am a policywonk I love bureaucracy and love all the great 
things—no irony—it’s done and doing. Also I love being really cautious about 
any set of rules, especially when the application of those rules seems to be 
more in behalf of the rule than for the desired outcome the rule is meant to 
promote. And I’ve always felt that with small groups working more or less well 
one does not want to introduce rules whose application would, in different 
circumstances, be more reasonable and in compliance with policy. In the case of 
a small project like Corinthia, the insistence of a protocol whose application 
would cost a tedious retread and risk losing the not just developer enthusiasm 
but, developers comes across as an assertion of power. And it’s irritating, to 
say the least.

People, let’s cool it. That goes to everyone. 

I’ve been in situations like this before; we all have. In open source projects, 
one learns to live with what works, even when that goes counter to policy, and 
to catch what can be caught, and if that’s not feasible, then to urge a "next 
time let’s be better" approach. Everyone knows it’s hard to work together and 
that when it happens, it’s fragile, especially for startup projects, like ours. 
And, again, Corinthia is small. Really small. It will stay that way—and maybe 
even shrink—if it seems a place of rigid bureaucracy and hostility. 

So: let’s cool it and move ahead. 

And, please, all, let’s try to keep communications public and open and 
inviting. I pushed for Corinthia because I see a huge opportunity for a 
flexible and advanced productivity tool that is not hobbled by proprietary code 
or standards and that can run on the devices people use, whatever they be. No 
other project aspires to do as much and none has as much force behind it. But 
none of that will matter if we mute ourselves and there is something like 
Corinthia that pretends to be open but is at heart shrink-wrapped and flows 
freely like beer to consumers, if not community.

louis

Reply via email to