Anyone have any thoughts about the appropriateness of this? My concerns are that:
* The link is unfounded and without explanation, it might be spam. * The link is to a site which promotes illegal activity. Where do we draw the line here, would we preserve a link to a racial hate site? In my opinion, comparing copyright infringement to racism is a little absurd, but it does illustrate that there is a fuzzy line here. Do we object to politically or ethically controversial outgoing links? On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:47:44AM -0000, Apache Wiki wrote: > Dear Wiki user, > > You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Couchdb Wiki" for > change notification. > > The following page has been changed by blackmagic rue: > http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/CouchDB_in_the_wild > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > * [http://github.com/jtulloch/scanty/tree/master Scanty on the Couch], a > port of Adam Wiggins' Scanty blog software > > == Websites == > + * [http://www.gpirate.com/ Gpirate], world's biggest torrent search engine > * [http://www.teenwag.com/ Teenwag], a Teen Social network > * [http://www.youfindr.com/ Youfindr], a Social search engine > * [http://www.wego.com/ Wego], a travel search website > @@ -30, +31 @@ > > == Facebook Applications == > * [http://apps.facebook.com/ukissme/ Will you Kissme], Dating game > * [http://apps.facebook.com/getlucky/ Horoscope], Horoscopes > - > + * [http://apps.facebook.com/bdayecards/ Birthday Greeting cards], > Greeting cards > > == Internal Use == > -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
