On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Zachary Zolton <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm... I can see what Damien is say though, it would be nice to show a > proper release, given the significant changes. > > Is there any way we could do a 0.9 release, and then release 0.9.1 > with security/replication merged in?
Or at least make a 0.10 release that's a quick follow up. I'd rather have a few versions closer together than too few versions too far apart. > > Besides, with all the recent newbie attention (myself included!) it'd > be nice to give the external package maintainers (ie Mac Ports) > something to do... And then folks could be running fairly-recent code. > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 9 Feb 2009, at 15:38, Damien Katz wrote: >> >>> Well, because there is no official release to tell people to use, except >>> 0.8.1. That's over 6 months old now, we have a bunch of new features and bug >>> fixes and performance improvements since then. >> >> I agree with Noah that we are in no rush and I'd rather >> see this integrated. Trunk is easy enough to work with >> for interested parties. >> >> >> Cheers >> Jan >> -- >> >> >>> On Feb 9, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Noah Slater wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 09:29:46AM -0500, Damien Katz wrote: >>>>> >>>>> So I'm wondering if we should just forget it for 0.9.0 and release it >>>>> without. It won't be beta yet and the security stuff useless as it is >>>>> now now, but all the other stuff that's in 0.9 will still be there. >>>>> Thoughts please. >>>> >>>> I would be inclined to wait a little, and include it. Where's the rush? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater >>> >>> >> >> >
