I see. Those two big features do make sense as a minor version. Would you say this is a fair rhetorical base for discussion?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_versioning#Change_significance On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Paul Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Zachary Zolton > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hmm... I can see what Damien is say though, it would be nice to show a >> proper release, given the significant changes. >> >> Is there any way we could do a 0.9 release, and then release 0.9.1 >> with security/replication merged in? > > Or at least make a 0.10 release that's a quick follow up. I'd rather > have a few versions closer together than too few versions too far > apart. > >> >> Besides, with all the recent newbie attention (myself included!) it'd >> be nice to give the external package maintainers (ie Mac Ports) >> something to do... And then folks could be running fairly-recent code. >> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 9 Feb 2009, at 15:38, Damien Katz wrote: >>> >>>> Well, because there is no official release to tell people to use, except >>>> 0.8.1. That's over 6 months old now, we have a bunch of new features and >>>> bug >>>> fixes and performance improvements since then. >>> >>> I agree with Noah that we are in no rush and I'd rather >>> see this integrated. Trunk is easy enough to work with >>> for interested parties. >>> >>> >>> Cheers >>> Jan >>> -- >>> >>> >>>> On Feb 9, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Noah Slater wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 09:29:46AM -0500, Damien Katz wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> So I'm wondering if we should just forget it for 0.9.0 and release it >>>>>> without. It won't be beta yet and the security stuff useless as it is >>>>>> now now, but all the other stuff that's in 0.9 will still be there. >>>>>> Thoughts please. >>>>> >>>>> I would be inclined to wait a little, and include it. Where's the rush? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
