On 14/02/2009, at 10:43 AM, Paul Davis wrote:
If the intention of the code is clear then why bother repeating the
intention, why bother repeating the intention when the code is clear?
See, its fucked up.
No, your comment proves nothing.
Anyway, there's a lot of literature on this subject, so you and I
arguing the point from scratch isn't efficient. Let's agree to disagree.
The scheme I was suggesting was keeping around a small set of tests to
check browser compliance with JS funcitonality that CouchDB requires.
Things like making sure your XHR can do DELETE's (which is a bug in
Opera we've run into).
My point is that these kinds of test are generally useful, outside of
Couch, as a separate project. Carefactor < epsilon :)
Antony Blakey
-------------
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of
comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and
controversy.
-- Martin Luther King
