So based on the responses, it looks like we need fully automated tests, runnable without the browser. And Erlang unit test integration.

Also people like running the tests in the browser and want even better integration for creating new tests. I see no reason we cannot have both. Chris Anderson has done a lot of work here already.

Looks like couch.js is fine as is.

Paul, I'm not sure why you object to long test names, but I do like the idea of tags for tests. Each test could be tagged for important functionality they test and use: replication, security, views, temp views, compaction, etc. That it makes it easy to quickly run all the tests touching certain features while you are developing. As the number of tests grow, this will become more useful IMO.

-Damien

Reply via email to