Is there any notion of beyond which release we'd like to maintain binary data compatibility with the 1.0 release?
Thanks, Zach On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Vicente, > > On 3 Mar 2009, at 13:01, Vicente Jiménez wrote: > >> I'm in favor of releasing more frequently. Having a new release this >> weekend or in a few days more, it's definetly a very good idea. > > Thanks for your support :) > > >> For the tag, as Chris Anderson suggest, we may evaluate to tag this >> release as 0.8.2 and keep all the plans (and API freeze promises) for >> the 0.9 version or release it as 0.9 and change all references to the >> new version target (0.10 or whatever). > > There are too many breaking changes between 0.8.1 and the proposed > 0.9.0 that releasing it as 0.8.2 is not a sensible idea. > Bugfix-version-bump- > releases should not break APIs. There's no real way around 0.9.0 here > and we need to make sure the release announcement are clear about what > to expect. > > Cheers > Jan > -- > - Show quoted text - > > > >> >> Cheers. >> >> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Christopher Lenz <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 02.03.2009, at 17:11, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >>>> >>>> I'd like to propose to release CouchDB 0.9 by the end of >>>> this week based on what is in trunk by then. >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>> Do I have your support? >>> >>> Yes, I'm in favor of getting a release out towards the end of this week. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> -- >>> Christopher Lenz >>> cmlenz at gmx.de >>> http://www.cmlenz.net/ >>> >>> >> > >
