On 3 Mar 2009, at 16:26, Zachary Zolton wrote:
Is there any notion of beyond which release we'd like to maintain
binary data compatibility with the 1.0 release?
The latest discussions revolved around having 0.10.0 the last pre-1.0
release that introduces a new API and database file compatibility.
Cheers
Jan
--
Thanks,
Zach
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Vicente,
On 3 Mar 2009, at 13:01, Vicente Jiménez wrote:
I'm in favor of releasing more frequently. Having a new release this
weekend or in a few days more, it's definetly a very good idea.
Thanks for your support :)
For the tag, as Chris Anderson suggest, we may evaluate to tag this
release as 0.8.2 and keep all the plans (and API freeze promises)
for
the 0.9 version or release it as 0.9 and change all references to
the
new version target (0.10 or whatever).
There are too many breaking changes between 0.8.1 and the proposed
0.9.0 that releasing it as 0.8.2 is not a sensible idea.
Bugfix-version-bump-
releases should not break APIs. There's no real way around 0.9.0 here
and we need to make sure the release announcement are clear about
what
to expect.
Cheers
Jan
--
- Show quoted text -
Cheers.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Christopher Lenz <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 02.03.2009, at 17:11, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
I'd like to propose to release CouchDB 0.9 by the end of
this week based on what is in trunk by then.
[...]
Do I have your support?
Yes, I'm in favor of getting a release out towards the end of
this week.
Cheers,
--
Christopher Lenz
cmlenz at gmx.de
http://www.cmlenz.net/
