I'm sorry; I hit the send button before completing my post. I was going
to say "...and that extern-handler capability"... is a rip-snorter of a
great idea. Its presence has definitely saved me weeks of work. I've
made one or two tentative changes to the Erlang code locally - if I find
myself becoming more proficient/confident at it - or discover anything
other way I might be useful in helping CouchDB become more
Windows-friendly, I'll certainly jump in to help.
On 3/06/2009 22:05, Kai Griffin wrote:
I've been using CouchDB (0.9.0) on windows for the past couple of
months. I switched from Linux so that I could use a large amount of
legacy C++ code, re-worked into a series of little executables, which
are launched by couch's extern handler to perform certain tasks. For
my purposes, CouchDB on windows has been operating very well, and that
extern-handler capability
On 3/06/2009 20:58, Nathan Stott wrote:
I'm mostly a windows user. I run couch on my Ubuntu laptop at the moment
but would like to try getting it running on my windows box that I dev on.
I'll read through the wiki and give it a shot.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 01:27:16PM -0400, Damien Katz wrote:
Ideally, what we'd end up with would be a completely automated Windows
build system that builds a complete installer and supports XP, Server
2003 & 2007, Vista, 7, etc. And we'd support running as a service and as
a user process and have nice Visual Studio integration.
I would like to see a Windows user sending us regular patches, and getting
stuck
in with the development and support of CouchDB from this perspective. After
a
while, I would want this person to become a full committer. I really don't
think
we should be claiming Windows support until at least one of the core
developers
is a genuine Windows user.
If you need pointers on where to get stuck in, I'm your guy.
--
Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
