On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > If you like temp views, I'd like to take your concerns into consideration. I like temp view for figuring stuff out. I'm not at the stage where I can have thought and presto perfect map/reduce materialises on the screen in a few keystrokes.I usually only have 10 max documents in the db. So have never run into the performance issues. After I've figured stuff out I create a proper view. Then proceed to fill up the database Since I now use ruby for views its not going to be much use to me having a js temp view emulator... I like ruby syntax, its nice: emit(key,val) unless doc.name.nil? Guess when you get rid of temp views "as is" it'll just take a bit longer to "try" stuff. Nick :)
