Hi Nick.
On 15 Jul 2009, at 18:19, Nicholas Orr wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote:
If you like temp views, I'd like to take your concerns into
consideration.
I like temp view for figuring stuff out.
I'm not at the stage where I can have thought and presto perfect map/
reduce
materialises on the screen in a few keystrokes.I usually only have
10 max
documents in the db.
So have never run into the performance issues.
After I've figured stuff out I create a proper view.
Then proceed to fill up the database
Since I now use ruby for views its not going to be much use to me
having a
js temp view emulator...
I like ruby syntax, its nice: emit(key,val) unless doc.name.nil?
Guess when you get rid of temp views "as is" it'll just take a bit
longer to
"try" stuff.
Good point. The couch.js implementation should also be a blueprint for
your favourite CouchDB client library. CouchRest is already modelled
after couch.js. The end-user should still be able to play around easily.
Cheers
Jan
--
