I don't like "get" because it clashes with the auto-imported erlang:get (for the process dictionary).
Any reason to prefer a macro over an -import statement? Adam On Sep 27, 2010, at 1:47 PM, Filipe David Manana wrote: > Hi, > > I'm getting tired of typing couch_util:get_value(......). It also > consumes too much horizontal space. It's probably the most used > function from couch_util. > I'm thinking of adding a new macro in couch_db.hrl, like: > > -define(value(Key, List), couch_util:get_value(Key, List)). > > -define(value(Key, List, Default), couch_util:get_value(Key, List, Default)). > > Or maybe naming the macro just "get". > > Anyone against it? > > > cheers > > -- > Filipe David Manana, > [email protected], [email protected] > > "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. > Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. > That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
