Unfortunately I'll have to revert the commits.

R13B03 and bellow don't allow for macros with same name but different
arities - compilation fails.
I guess we'll have to use import where needed.

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Filipe David Manana
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Damien Katz <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I wouldn't mind it being ?get(...) as required by a macro. Also, I think it 
>> could be an import statement in couch_db.hrl, so it's automatic for all 
>> including files.
>
> couch_util includes couch_db.hrl so we get a compile error.
>
>>
>> -Damien
>>
>>
>> On Sep 27, 2010, at 11:06 AM, Filipe David Manana wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Adam Kocoloski <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> I don't like "get" because it clashes with the auto-imported erlang:get 
>>>> (for the process dictionary).
>>>>
>>>> Any reason to prefer a macro over an -import statement?
>>>
>>> Just to avoid doing the import everywhere and I still consider
>>> get_value too long :P
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Adam
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 27, 2010, at 1:47 PM, Filipe David Manana wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm getting tired of typing couch_util:get_value(......). It also
>>>>> consumes too much horizontal space. It's probably the most used
>>>>> function from couch_util.
>>>>> I'm thinking of adding a new macro in couch_db.hrl, like:
>>>>>
>>>>> -define(value(Key, List), couch_util:get_value(Key, List)).
>>>>>
>>>>> -define(value(Key, List, Default), couch_util:get_value(Key, List, 
>>>>> Default)).
>>>>>
>>>>> Or maybe naming the macro just "get".
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone against it?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> cheers
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Filipe David Manana,
>>>>> [email protected], [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
>>>>>  Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
>>>>>  That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Filipe David Manana,
>>> [email protected], [email protected]
>>>
>>> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
>>>  Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
>>>  That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Filipe David Manana,
> [email protected], [email protected]
>
> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
>  Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
>  That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
>



-- 
Filipe David Manana,
[email protected], [email protected]

"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
 Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
 That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."

Reply via email to