COUCHDB-926 is now fixed. As for at least 1.1.0, I would like to have COUCHDB-949 in it (and maybe 1.0.2 as well). Vote?
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Randall Leeds <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 on making the branches. > > I'd be happy to look into 926. > On Nov 17, 2010 6:55 AM, "Jan Lehnardt" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Heya, >> >> I spent some time trimming down the open issues for 1.0.2 and 1.1.0: >> >> http://s.apache.org/couchdb-open-issues-1.0.2 (1 open issue) >> http://s.apache.org/couchdb-open-issues-1.1.0 (3 open issues) >> >> To get things rolling, I propose creating the 1.1.x release branch >> now. The remaining patches can easily be backported and we can >> continue feature work on trunk. >> >> -- >> >> The issues are: >> >> 1.0.2: >> >> "Compaction does not release file descriptors" >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-926 >> >> 1.1.0: >> >> "out of memory crash when compacting document with lots of edit branches" >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-888 >> >> "refactor os process management" >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-901 >> >> And 926 again. >> >> If anybody can help out with these, that'd be great :) >> >> Cheers >> Jan >> -- >> > -- Filipe David Manana, [email protected], [email protected] "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
