On 13 Jun 2011, at 18:16, Peter Nolan wrote: > What is this 'spam'? Haven't personally encountered anything on the wiki > that would be 'considered' spam (perhaps not stumbled upon that portion?)
Because we nuke it as it arrives. That's what prompted my original email. > But it's inevitable that the wiki will be attacked by unscrupulous people > and as such, the wiki should prepare for this. The wiki is going to need > gatekeepers/admins to maintain it. I am one, and I'm sick of doing it. > It would be nice, that any edits be archived so users can see previous > states of the page if they so choose so. They are. > If a noted jerk keeps editing the wiki, we should have a system that only > applies his edits to his account. The common user would not see his edits, > only he would, which would hopefully convince him that his edit has gone > through. Not gonna happen. It's MoinMoin or Confluence. :)
