On 14 Jun 2011, at 18:31, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > I understand. So is your suggestion to just use docbook or html ? Both > are OK for me .
DocBook in this instance. It will make tooling and build time compilation much smoother. And there are plenty of editors for it. HTML would be okay if it was only being done once per edition of a book, where you can afford the one-off cost of converting the HTML to DocBook. But there are no good tools for this at the moment.
