On 28 Jun 2011, at 17:09, Sebastian Cohnen wrote: >> Perhaps there is some good reason for them failing? > > I was not aware that the javascript CLI tests are "officially" ready to use > yet. In that case it's definitely not okay if they are failing and since > others have seen the same failing tests, I'd change my vote to −1.
If they are not ready to use yet, that is a good reason for them failing. If they should be part of the test procedure, then they should a) pass and b) be added to the wiki. Sorry for being so ARGH about it, but I like to run a tight ship, so we should get clarification on this either way. Thanks!
