On 28 Jun 2011, at 18:11, Noah Slater wrote: > > On 28 Jun 2011, at 17:09, Sebastian Cohnen wrote: > >>> Perhaps there is some good reason for them failing? >> >> I was not aware that the javascript CLI tests are "officially" ready to use >> yet. In that case it's definitely not okay if they are failing and since >> others have seen the same failing tests, I'd change my vote to −1. > > If they are not ready to use yet, that is a good reason for them failing. If > they should be part of the test procedure, then they should a) pass and b) be > added to the wiki. Sorry for being so ARGH about it, but I like to run a > tight ship, so we should get clarification on this either way. Thanks!
It's all good Noah, I'm 100% behind you here :) Sebastian, sorry, I didn't see you were running the still experimental CLI tests. Cheers Jan --
