[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13099600#comment-13099600
]
Bob Dionne commented on COUCHDB-1270:
-------------------------------------
+1
I think the compact and compact_swap functions make the API somewhat specific,
but a no-op implementation is easy. Implementers will certainly need to know
the atoms that the `get(Field,State)` function is looking for. All the tests
run with the latest version.
Well done Paul!
> Rewrite the view engine
> -----------------------
>
> Key: COUCHDB-1270
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1270
> Project: CouchDB
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: JavaScript View Server
> Reporter: Paul Joseph Davis
> Attachments: 0001-Minor-changes-for-new-indexing-engine.patch,
> 0002-Create-the-couch_index-application.patch,
> 0003-Create-the-couch_mrview-application.patch,
> 0004-Remove-the-old-view-engine.patch
>
>
> The view engine has been creaky and cluttered. As shown by GeoCouch, adding
> new indexers basically involves copying the entire view engine and hacking
> the parts that are different. In short, the opposite of good engineering.
> Over the last couple weeks I've refactored the view engine and reimplemented
> the map/reduce view engine. These changes are 100% internal and no external
> behavior has changed. Performance is just a tiny bit better than trunk. I did
> do some playing trying to improve view update times and there are some dances
> we could do, but for the time being I wanted to keep the same general
> architecture for updates so that the changes are minimal.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
