On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 09:56, Pepijn de Vos <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I think proposal 1 makes more sense. Open for suggestions > > about how the limits look. > > I'm also for proposal 1. I'm not an expert, but we have os_process_timeout > already, wouldn't that work? > That's for killing/reaping os processes that become unresponsive. This thread suggests a system wherein the query server is responding, but being asked to repeat the operation because there was a conflict.
