Okay, so a new config value will have to be introduced? Where would be the best way to specify if a function can be repeated? In the request? It's the most flexible, and I don't see any harm, but I don't see a need either. Somewhere in the ddoc maybe?
What is the process for contributing a patch? I'm nor Erlang programmer, but I'd like to keep the ball rolling. Pepijn On Sep 15, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Randall Leeds wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 09:56, Pepijn de Vos <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> I think proposal 1 makes more sense. Open for suggestions >>> about how the limits look. >> >> I'm also for proposal 1. I'm not an expert, but we have os_process_timeout >> already, wouldn't that work? >> > > That's for killing/reaping os processes that become unresponsive. This > thread suggests a system wherein the query server is responding, but being > asked to repeat the operation because there was a conflict.
