Okay cool. Dave, I will work with you over the next few days to come up with, and document, our procedure.
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <[email protected]> wrote: > On 15 January 2012 23:45, Randall Leeds <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's been over a week since this thread started. I've been circling in > > a holding pattern around current master so as not to create noise that > > detracts from this RFC and voting. > > I don't see anything else holding up 1.2. I say, "ship it!" > > > > -Randall > > > > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 13:31, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I await your feedback. > >> > >> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Robert Newson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> If it's a regression, before. If not, after. > >>> > >>> B. > > Ship it! SHIP IT!! > > Credit to "Doctor Bob" for working through with me where my remaining > issue was lurking. > > Noah - yes I'll roll Windows binaries, how does this fit in with the > actual release process? > Would it be separate artefact / vote? I'll check out the Apache Web > approach. > > A+ > Dave >
