I await your feedback. On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote:
> If it's a regression, before. If not, after. > > B. > > On 15 January 2012 19:40, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > > Are we going to punt on a Windows binary, Dave? > > > > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> On 15 January 2012 19:05, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Bump. Dave? Gonna move without if you don't speak up. :) > >> > >> Sorry!! Literally *just* finished looking at this. > >> > >> TL;DR - let's roll 1.2.0. > >> > >> I don't see any *functional* issues in the failures from the test > >> suite - attachments are written, and read, correctly. For some as yet > >> unknown reason the MD5 is different on Windows vs Linux & Mac OS, but > >> this has been present for some time. It's only turned up as a result > >> of additional tests applied in COUCHDB-1337. > >> > >> The underlying crypto:md5 values are the same, and so is the raw HTTP > >> data. I am still digging through mochi to where this comes from. > >> > >> I don't see any issues for replication - can anybody confirm? This > >> looks like a dev issue rather than user impacting. > >> > >> from 1.1.1_js-1.8.0: > >> 12> Digest = base64:encode(Digest_Binary). > >> <<"jeLnIuUvK7d+6gya044lVA==">> > >> > >> from 1.2.x: > >> 8> Digest = base64:encode(Digest_Binary). > >> <<"jeLnIuUvK7d+6gya044lVA==">> > >> > >> A+ > >> Dave > >> >
