Deferring to Paul, but sounds okay. On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Randall Leeds <[email protected]>wrote:
> Okay if I just delete the branch? > On Feb 24, 2012 3:36 PM, "Noah Slater" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Randal, can you rewind your changes please? > > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > Indeed. Infra is requiring website code to remain in SVN for the time > > > being and use the svnpubsub stuff they have configured. > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Randall Leeds < > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 00:00, Noah Slater <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hey, > > > >> > > > >> I appreciate the gesture. But I think we may need to leave the > website > > > in > > > >> Subversion for now. The infrastructure side of things hooks in to > it. > > We > > > >> may be able to move to Git, but we should clarify that with infra > > first. > > > > > > > > I had the same thought, but went ahead anyway knowing it would have > no > > > > integration. > > > > Probably a silly gesture. > > > > > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Randall Leeds < > > [email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> I just pulled the site/htdocs directory from svn and put it up into > > > >>> the htdocs branch on git. > > > >>> > > > >>> I goofed and didn't have site checked out, only htdocs, but rather > > > >>> than make more noise right now I won't correct that, since I don't > > > >>> know how much that code will change anyway. > > > >>> It's a small gesture to help push its development. > > > >>> > > > > > >
