Yeah. Delete away!
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > Deferring to Paul, but sounds okay. > > On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Randall Leeds <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Okay if I just delete the branch? >> On Feb 24, 2012 3:36 PM, "Noah Slater" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Randal, can you rewind your changes please? >> > >> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected] >> > >wrote: >> > >> > > Indeed. Infra is requiring website code to remain in SVN for the time >> > > being and use the svnpubsub stuff they have configured. >> > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Randall Leeds < >> [email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 00:00, Noah Slater <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > >> Hey, >> > > >> >> > > >> I appreciate the gesture. But I think we may need to leave the >> website >> > > in >> > > >> Subversion for now. The infrastructure side of things hooks in to >> it. >> > We >> > > >> may be able to move to Git, but we should clarify that with infra >> > first. >> > > > >> > > > I had the same thought, but went ahead anyway knowing it would have >> no >> > > > integration. >> > > > Probably a silly gesture. >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Randall Leeds < >> > [email protected] >> > > >wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >>> I just pulled the site/htdocs directory from svn and put it up into >> > > >>> the htdocs branch on git. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> I goofed and didn't have site checked out, only htdocs, but rather >> > > >>> than make more noise right now I won't correct that, since I don't >> > > >>> know how much that code will change anyway. >> > > >>> It's a small gesture to help push its development. >> > > >>> >> > > >> > >>
