Its old enough we should be recommending people to not use it. Having it on our downloads pages is a subtle endorsement that its still usable. If people really need it for some reason they can still get it from the archives.
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > Why? > > On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Paul Davis > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> We should archive 1.0.3 >> >> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Chaps, >> > >> > Our current active releases are: >> > >> > 1.2.0 >> > 1.1.1 >> > 1.0.3 >> > >> > >> > I am going to keep these as active releases for the time being. >> > >> > Please speak up if you think we should archive 1.0.3. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > N >>
