Oops. Should *not* recommend.
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > Its old enough we should be recommending people to not use it. Having > it on our downloads pages is a subtle endorsement that its still > usable. If people really need it for some reason they can still get it > from the archives. > > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> Why? >> >> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Paul Davis >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> We should archive 1.0.3 >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Chaps, >>> > >>> > Our current active releases are: >>> > >>> > 1.2.0 >>> > 1.1.1 >>> > 1.0.3 >>> > >>> > >>> > I am going to keep these as active releases for the time being. >>> > >>> > Please speak up if you think we should archive 1.0.3. >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > >>> > N >>>
