On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <[email protected]> wrote: >> Any other corner cases? > > I don't think CouchDB should invent it's own JSON patching scheme. I > guess it would be best to implement, say, > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pbryan-json-patch-04 (but make sure > to track the ID until it becomes a standard). > > Cheers, > > Dirkjan
We've discussed this a number of times before and have always ended up with exactly what Dirkjan describes. There's no accepted JSON patch scheme that is widely adopted. There have been a few attempts but I've not seen anything gather significant adoption to warrant picking sides in that fight.
