On 30 July 2012 17:36, Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <[email protected]> wrote: >> Any other corner cases? > > I don't think CouchDB should invent it's own JSON patching scheme. I > guess it would be best to implement, say, > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pbryan-json-patch-04 (but make sure > to track the ID until it becomes a standard). > > Cheers, > > Dirkjan
Dirkjan, thanks, that had conveniently slipped my mind. We'd still need to provide doc.id and doc.rev in addition to what's in the draft. Is there any interest in implementing this, even initially as an update handler until the draft is finalised? A+ Dave
