On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Nov 1, 2012, at 12:46 , Simon Metson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 11:35, Alexander Shorin wrote: > > > >> Because it's additional semi justified dependencies and whole project > >> goes far away from couchapp concept, imho. > > > > I don't think it does. In fact I'd say it emphasises the flexibility of > couch apps and how they play nicely with other tools ("hey look, you can > use this database with the toolset I'm used to from jquery"). > >> If Erica will be bundled tool out of CouchDB box, better to dance > around him. > > > > I'd rather use something that exists today and evaluate erica when it is > included with CouchDB and has the necessary feature set in the future. > > > > With grunt we can get consistent build environments, with erica we'd > either have people installing tools (linters, less compiler, minify-ers > etc) manually/ad-hoc, have to rely on something like npm (and if we're > doing that, why not use grunt?) or build it ourselves (eurgh!). > > In addition, we make this all more attractive for direly needed > web-developer contributors. > > Major +1 on grunt + bbb. > > Cheers > Jan > -- > > attractive for who ?
