On Nov 1, 2012, at 19:03 , Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Nov 1, 2012, at 12:46 , Simon Metson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 11:35, Alexander Shorin wrote: >>> >>>> Because it's additional semi justified dependencies and whole project >>>> goes far away from couchapp concept, imho. >>> >>> I don't think it does. In fact I'd say it emphasises the flexibility of >> couch apps and how they play nicely with other tools ("hey look, you can >> use this database with the toolset I'm used to from jquery"). >>>> If Erica will be bundled tool out of CouchDB box, better to dance >> around him. >>> >>> I'd rather use something that exists today and evaluate erica when it is >> included with CouchDB and has the necessary feature set in the future. >>> >>> With grunt we can get consistent build environments, with erica we'd >> either have people installing tools (linters, less compiler, minify-ers >> etc) manually/ad-hoc, have to rely on something like npm (and if we're >> doing that, why not use grunt?) or build it ourselves (eurgh!). >> >> In addition, we make this all more attractive for direly needed >> web-developer contributors. >> >> Major +1 on grunt + bbb. >> >> Cheers >> Jan >> -- >> > attractive for who ? Web-developers who can contribute to Futon. Cheers Jan --
