Thanks for the refinement on your votes. It's common, on OS X, to have to do a 'while true; ./utils run; done' thing, which I did myself. For my part, I can't count your +1 for 1.0.4 but I don't think that will hold up the release.
On 2 January 2013 18:35, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > The ASF policy states: > > "Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download the signed source > code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting executable on > their own platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the > requirements of the ASF policy on releases." > > I figured that in this instance, it would be useful for me to +1 based on > correctness of packaging alone. As release managers for this VOTE, I would > understand it if you want to discount my vote on 1.0.4. > > However, my vote on 1.1.2 should be counted. I was able to compile the > code, and I was able to get a mostly passing test suite. (Which we have > accepted in the past as being okay.) Unless the failure I got is alarming? > I can re-run if required. > > > On 2 January 2013 18:10, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If you can +1 despite being "unable to run the code or run either test >> suite." then I'm not sure what the release procedure is for. >> >> B. >> >> On 2 January 2013 17:59, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Running all tests with Erlang R15B02 (erts-5.9.2) and SpiderMonkey 1.8.5. >> > >> > = 1.0.4 = >> > >> > Got as far as: >> > >> > ./configure --prefix=/tmp/couchdb/install >> > >> > This is from the Checking the Release Artefacts section in the release >> > procedure. Unable to configure the source because my SpiderMonkey is too >> > new. Tried to compile from source, but got errors. No available Ubuntu >> > image has a package old enough. I am happy that the release is fine, >> > though, obviously, I have been unable to run the code or run either test >> > suite. >> > >> > This artefact gets my +1 >> > >> > = 1.1.2 = >> > >> > Got as far as running the Futon test suite. (Surprised I got this far >> with >> > my up-to-date versions of both Erlang and SpiderMonkey.) Extensive >> > segmentation faults and bus errors. All tests pass except oauth. >> > >> > This artefact gets my +1 >> > >> > = 1.2.1 = >> > >> > Completed the Futon test suite. Extensive segmentation faults and bus >> > errors. All tests pass. >> > >> > This artefact gets my +1 >> > >> > >> > >> > On 29 December 2012 20:12, Dave Cottlehuber <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> We would like to call a vote for Apache CouchDB, 1.0.4, 1.1.2, and >> 1.2.1, >> >> first round, maintenance releases, to start your New Year with a bang. >> >> >> >> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release >> >> artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the >> releases >> >> are made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! >> >> >> >> We are voting on the following release artifacts, by different release >> >> managers to spread the load. >> >> >> >> Robert Newson: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.0.4 >> >> >> >> Dave Cottlehuber: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~dch/dist/1.1.2 >> >> http://people.apache.org/~dch/dist/1.2.1 >> >> >> >> PGP Keys: >> >> https://people.apache.org/~dch/dist/KEYS >> >> >> >> These artifacts have been built from the following git commits: >> >> >> >> 1.0.4: 514b7ef95cf67a06f094d56b6ab86b4a770292bd >> >> 1.1.2: 306a6eb4405de878313b46ef026a6089503b693a >> >> 1.2.1: 5ebfa8e4bce7322ae0d7b7d95f269425cdb9a46c >> >> >> >> Please follow the test procedure before voting: >> >> >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure >> >> >> >> Note the following restrictions for both 1.0.4 and 1.1.2: >> >> >> >> Erlang/OTP R14B* or lower >> >> Spidermonkey 1.8.0rc1 or lower >> >> >> >> Thank you. >> >> >> >> Happy voting, >> >> Dave & Bob. >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > NS >> > > > > -- > NS
