> On 12 April 2013 09:14, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thinking about this, we might want to clarify the difference between a >> release not being supported, and a release being archived. Obviously, it >> makes no sense to keep around two bugfix versions of the same minor release >> line. (In this case, 1.2.1 and 1.2.2.) But 1.2.1 was released in January, >> so I think we'll probably want to "support" it for 12 months, as we've >> previously discussed. I am not exactly sure what "support" means in this >> context. I guess when we talk about supporting releases, what we actually >> mean is that we support major/minor release lines. So, in this case, we >> "support" 1.2.x, in so much as we will continue to apply bugfixes to that >> branch. >> >> Do I have this right? (I will update the current release page and my email >> template if I get confirmation.)
Sounds good to me. +1 for archiving it as well btw.
