Thanks for the clarification guys. This passed lazy consensus. I will see to it soon.
On 15 April 2013 19:00, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Apr 12, 2013, at 14:14 , Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thinking about this, we might want to clarify the difference between a > > release not being supported, and a release being archived. Obviously, it > > makes no sense to keep around two bugfix versions of the same minor > release > > line. (In this case, 1.2.1 and 1.2.2.) But 1.2.1 was released in January, > > so I think we'll probably want to "support" it for 12 months, as we've > > previously discussed. I am not exactly sure what "support" means in this > > context. I guess when we talk about supporting releases, what we actually > > mean is that we support major/minor release lines. So, in this case, we > > "support" 1.2.x, in so much as we will continue to apply bugfixes to that > > branch. > > > > Do I have this right? (I will update the current release page and my > email > > template if I get confirmation.) > > +1 > > > > > > > On 12 April 2013 13:58, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Dear community, > >> > >> I would like to archive Apache CouchDB 1.2.1 > >> > >> Reasons: > >> > >> * CouchDB 1.2.1 has been superseded by CouchDB 1.2.2 > >> > >> Archiving this release means that we no longer support it, and we will > >> remove any references to it from our website and our wiki. However, the > >> original files will still be available to anyone browsing the release > >> archives. > >> > >> For more information, see: > >> > >> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/CurrentReleases#Archived_Releases > >> > >> You do not need to respond if you are in agreement. If there is no > >> response in 72 hours, I will assume lazy consensus. > >> > >> If we reach consensus, I archive the release. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> -- > >> NS > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > NS > > -- NS
