Yep. One that date we can look at master and see what we have. If we have any features, then we bump the minor version. If we have anything that breaks backwards compatibility, then we bump the major.
I am happy to handhold anybody if they would like to try doing a release. I think it's important for the project that as many people as possible feel comfortable doing them. On 3 July 2013 17:55, Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > > So, I am proposing that we attempt to do a new release four weeks after > the > > last release. > > +1. > > > One other change I am proposing: I think that in three weeks, we should > cut > > whatever is ready. If that means a major point revision, so be it. Minor, > > so be it. Patch, so be it. Whatever is ready. No artificial "patch > > release", "patch release", "feature release" dance. > > I'm not sure how that works. Are we going to work only on master and > make it a feature release if we have any new features after 4 weeks? > > Also, I'm itching to help out with RMing so it doesn't block on so few > people. > > Cheers, > > Dirkjan > -- NS
