On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > Yep. One that date we can look at master and see what we have. If we have > any features, then we bump the minor version. If we have anything that > breaks backwards compatibility, then we bump the major.
So that means we have no guarantees of any kind on how long we go between feature releases, which also means our shortest possible maintenance window for old release might be something like 8-10 weeks? I mean, personally I'm fine with this, I always keep up to date with the latest release anyway. But what you're proposing here seems like a somewhat big deal for those slightly more enterprisey types who like themselves some stability, instead of forcing to be upgraded to a release with new features (and consequently, new bugs). Cheers, Dirkjan
