FWIW I avoid the wiki because of the pain and slowness. Speed is a feature, and the wiki is slow. It is slow to execute, but also it is slow to sign in (every time I sign in, it begins with a "forgot password" step). And it is slow to join. New editors must email asking for permission.
Often, when I talk though an idea on dev@, the next step is to write up a simple plan. I wish I could do that on the wiki but I hadn't even considered it. On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: > "None of that presupposes a tool migration." > > Agreed (of course), but it doesn't preclude it either. > > I'd use the switch as a chance to clean up the wiki, importing only > what's good and true. > > B. > > > > On 12 August 2013 08:32, Dave Cottlehuber <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 12 August 2013 04:14, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I am still interested in moving to Confluence, though perhaps it's less > >> pressing. So if others could weight in, that'd still be cool. > > > > This was discussed previously[1] in May. I assume that moinmoin > > slowness atm is another round of spam attacks, this is reported on a > > couple of other projects I use too. > > > > Nota Bene, IMHO the most important part is to review each/every page > > and migrate content to .rst docs, or clean/dump as required. None of > > that presupposes a tool migration. > > > > A+ > > Dave > > > > [1]: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201305.mbox/%3CCAPkS=xn_ut26yydzg62jm1+kofywmelnsoysfb7ne1j+v7r...@mail.gmail.com%3E >
