"New editors must email asking for permission." A timely reminder. Does Confluence have better anti-spam protection? That alone is a compelling reason to switch.
B. On 12 August 2013 09:24, Jason Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > FWIW I avoid the wiki because of the pain and slowness. > > Speed is a feature, and the wiki is slow. It is slow to execute, but also > it is slow to sign in (every time I sign in, it begins with a "forgot > password" step). And it is slow to join. New editors must email asking for > permission. > > Often, when I talk though an idea on dev@, the next step is to write up a > simple plan. I wish I could do that on the wiki but I hadn't even > considered it. > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> "None of that presupposes a tool migration." >> >> Agreed (of course), but it doesn't preclude it either. >> >> I'd use the switch as a chance to clean up the wiki, importing only >> what's good and true. >> >> B. >> >> >> >> On 12 August 2013 08:32, Dave Cottlehuber <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On 12 August 2013 04:14, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I am still interested in moving to Confluence, though perhaps it's less >> >> pressing. So if others could weight in, that'd still be cool. >> > >> > This was discussed previously[1] in May. I assume that moinmoin >> > slowness atm is another round of spam attacks, this is reported on a >> > couple of other projects I use too. >> > >> > Nota Bene, IMHO the most important part is to review each/every page >> > and migrate content to .rst docs, or clean/dump as required. None of >> > that presupposes a tool migration. >> > >> > A+ >> > Dave >> > >> > [1]: >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201305.mbox/%3CCAPkS=xn_ut26yydzg62jm1+kofywmelnsoysfb7ne1j+v7r...@mail.gmail.com%3E >>
