Sorry about this, can we please remove [email protected] as 
it is discontinued.
I don't think [email protected] can work in this case.

Thanks.

On 20 May 2014, at 09:37, Sneha Nathani <[email protected]> wrote:

> Failed to deliver to '[email protected]'
> SMTP module(domain [192.168.0.108]) reports:
> host [192.168.0.108] says:
> 550 [email protected] unknown user account
> 
> Reporting-MTA: dns; inflightproductions.com
> 
> Original-Recipient: rfc822;<[email protected] >
> Final-Recipient: rfc822;<[email protected] >
> Action: failed
> Status: 5.0.0
> Remote-MTA: dns; [192.168.0.108]
> Diagnostic-Code: smtp;host [192.168.0.108] says:
> 550 [email protected] unknown user account
> Received: from [192.168.0.246] (HELO ifpmax)
> by inflightproductions.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.7)
> with SMTP id 28593088; Fri, 16 May 2014 17:17:58 +0100
> Subject: Job Sheet Completed
> To: [email protected]
> From: [email protected]
> Return-Path: [email protected]
> Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 17:17:58 +0100
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="=_d1758738fcaa5d82784cdfb4f9ce416f"
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Message-ID: <[email protected]
> 
> On 19 May 2014, at 21:30, Joan Touzet <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Jason, thanks for your time to review the text.
>> 
>> I've inserted the Oxford comma everywhere. I've also added "excessive or
>> unnecessary profanity" to the laundry list.
>> 
>> For point 5, the parallel structure is limited to finishing the sentence
>> "We strive to..." and doesn't have to start with "be," see point 7 for
>> the canonical counterexample.
>> 
>> I've explicitly avoided most of the terms you mention (respect,
>> politeness, civility) because they don't alone capture all of the
>> behaviours listed there. To wit, you can insult a friend jokingly, but
>> others may not understand the humorous intent and find it upsetting or
>> offputting. In the text, it does say you should not "insult or put down
>> other participants." I think that's clear enough. I am open to "choose
>> words carefully" if others think the current text is too wordy, but
>> the current text does come directly from upstream @ 
>> http://speakup.io/coc.html
>> 
>> -Joan
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jason Smith" <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 2:09:52 PM
>> Subject: Re: Code of Conduct & Diversity Statement draft needs your feedback!
>> h
>> Hi, Joan. Thanks for this!
>> 
>> First, a perhaps trivial note: the document switches once or twice to and
>> from the Oxford comma. ("...twitter, and"; "...friendly and")
>> 
>> I have two comments about specific guideline 5 ("words we choose").
>> 
>> Can we get profanity explicity listed here? It is generally considered
>> unprofessional; but I don't like it on inclusiveness grounds. Profanity is
>> characteristically Western and it can be a turn-off for non-Westerners. I
>> would phase it: "excessive or unnecessary profanity"
>> 
>> Next, as much as possible, should we stick to "what you do" rather than
>> "what you are"? Rather than "be careful in the words that we choose" what
>> about "be respectful" or "be polite" or "be professional"? I can imagine
>> somebody saying "I *did* carefully choose to say <something hurtful>
>> because the situation demanded it."
>> 
>> I know this code is intentionally subjective, so maybe my loophole is no
>> big deal. Anyway, the current phrasing is a bit awkward in its own right.
>> Maybe just "Choose words carefully" or "Communicate politely" (or any
>> synonym). Or to keep your parallel structure, maybe "Be civil."
>> 
>> 
>> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 6:19 AM, Joan Touzet <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello everyone,
>>> 
>>> The draft CoC and diversity statement have been published at:
>>> 
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=41812010
>>> 
>>> The wiki is a bit slow today so if it doesn't load the first time, hit
>>> reload and be patient.
>>> 
>>> Please take the time to review this and post comments here on the dev
>>> ML.
>>> 
>>> Outstanding items (2 and 3 are specifically for the PMC):
>>> 
>>> 1. Create expanded CoC for conferences/events
>>> 2. Determine appropriate venue and scope for diversity ML
>>> 3. Determine appropriate private reporting compliance mechanism
>>> 
>>> -Joan
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----------------------------
>> 
>> 
>> Registered Office: 15 Stukeley Street, London WC2B 5LT, England.
>> Registered in England number 1421223
>> 
>> This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain 
>> privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have 
>> received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
>> original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Please note that 
>> the information provided in this e-mail is in any case not legally binding; 
>> all committing statements require legally binding signatures.
>> 
>> 
>> http://www.inflightproductions.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----------------------------
> 
> 
> Registered Office: 15 Stukeley Street, London WC2B 5LT, England.
> Registered in England number 1421223
> 
> This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, 
> proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in 
> error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any 
> other use of the email by you is prohibited. Please note that the information 
> provided in this e-mail is in any case not legally binding; all committing 
> statements require legally binding signatures.
> 
> 
> http://www.inflightproductions.com
> 

Reply via email to