+1. The diff itself is not very clear but that’s a tool limitation. It appears to accurately reflect the changes that Noah describes and hence I am voting for it.
Future votes, however, should be purely on a readable diff once we have the tooling to provide such. B. On 28 Jul 2014, at 16:21, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > New doc is here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=44302833 > > Diff is here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=44302833&selectedPageVersions=2&selectedPageVersions=1 > > I messed up the copying and pasting of the old doc, and there are big > sections of blue. This is just the rich text stuff getting confused. > Those blue sections indicate "formatting changes", but no such changes > were made. > > > On 28 July 2014 17:08, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> Please stand by. Recreating the page so y'all can see a proper diff. >> >> On 28 July 2014 16:55, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hello folks, >>> >>> In a discussion between myself, Joan, and Bob on IRC today, it became >>> clear that there are some major errors that need fixing ASAP. >>> >>> Here's my candidate doc that we are voting on: >>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=44302814 >>> >>> This vote uses majority approval model and expires in 72 hours. >>> >>> Please review and cast your vote. >>> >>> The page history is messy, but here is a list of the changes I made, >>> in order of importance. The last half are a wrap-up of all the >>> outstanding errata. >>> >>> - Dropped "majority approval" approval model, as this allowed blocking >>> -1 votes on non-technical decisions. Confirmed with other major >>> contributors to the bylaws that this did not match our intentions >>> >>> - Updated decision table to use "lazy majority" or "lazy 2/3 majority" >>> instead of "majority approval" as necessary >>> >>> - Clarified that "veto" only applies to -1 votes using RTC >>> >>> - Change our most preferred method of decision making to "Lazy >>> consensus or RTC" per Bob's feedback that we actually have two primary >>> decision making models, one for code and one for everything else >>> >>> - Dropped a redundant sentence about the Chair not being a leader >>> >>> - Changed "RTC Approval & Vetos" to "RTC and Vetos" so anchors work >>> >>> - Fixed internal anchors, and added a few additional ones >>> >>> - Added example about using email TAGS >>> >>> - Tightened up wording about the PMC delegating responsibility >>> >>> - Minor fixes for wording and case >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> -- >>> Noah Slater >>> https://twitter.com/nslater >> >> >> >> -- >> Noah Slater >> https://twitter.com/nslater > > > > -- > Noah Slater > https://twitter.com/nslater
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
