On 28 July 2014 20:53, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: > Quoting the "bylaws" you're refferrng: > > If a proposal is particularly controversial, try making it reversible.
This proposal is not "particularly controversial". You're the only person who disagrees, with the use of a single word. Please, PLEASE, respect the fact that we have wasted *many* person hours on this thread already, and it is interminable. There is no unanimous resolution. So either we take a tally in the form of a vote, to confirm the consensus, or you drop it. Continuing to reply to emails here about how you don't like this word is unproductive and not respectful of project resources. > Note that i am the one to decide if I abandon it. It's clear that if no one > agreed in a limited time, I will just consider it as abandoned. My last > proposal based on this discussion is indeed the last I will have. It is already clear to me what the result is. -- Noah Slater https://twitter.com/nslater
