On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 28 July 2014 20:53, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Quoting the "bylaws" you're refferrng: > > > > If a proposal is particularly controversial, try making it > reversible. > > This proposal is not "particularly controversial". You're the only > person who disagrees, with the use of a single word. > > Please, PLEASE, respect the fact that we have wasted *many* person > hours on this thread already, and it is interminable. There is no > unanimous resolution. So either we take a tally in the form of a vote, > to confirm the consensus, or you drop it. Continuing to reply to > emails here about how you don't like this word is unproductive and not > respectful of project resources. > > > Note that i am the one to decide if I abandon it. It's clear that if no > one > > agreed in a limited time, I will just consider it as abandoned. My last > > proposal based on this discussion is indeed the last I will have. > > It is already clear to me what the result is. > Maybe, but actually you are actually wasting my time. I made a *last* proposal, I do care about an answer about it. If you don't have anything to add to that topic please don't interfere. - benoit
