+1

My preference to simplify some of the technical terms in the CoC do not prevent 
me voting for the intent behind them, and I recognise that no list of diversity 
axes can be complete.

To those that don’t recognise race, congratulations! You are right, there’s 
just one human race. At least for now, though, opposing racism as commonly 
understood remains a moral imperative and one I’m happy to endorse.

B.


On 4 Aug 2014, at 05:52, Joan Touzet <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joan Touzet" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Saturday, August 2, 2014 9:18:50 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] CouchDB Code of Conduct & Diversity Statement
> 
> Voting period starts         03:00:00 UTC on Sunday, August 3, 2014
> Votes must be received by    23:59:59 UTC on Sunday, August 10, 2014
> 
> 
> INTRODUCTION
> ============
> This Call For Votes is for voting in the official Apache CouchDB Code
> of Conduct and Diversity Statement. For voting questions or problems,
> contact the PMC at [email protected].
> 
> The intent is to make this an official document of Apache CouchDB.
> Once it becomes official, the text will be transferred into the SVN
> repository, and a link will be left on the wiki.
> 
> To cast a binding vote, you need to be a CouchDB PMC member. Others are
> welcome to cast non-binding votes.
> 
> 
> HOW TO VOTE
> ===========
> First, read the full text of the proposal.
> 
> The text of the bylaw document being voted on can be found at:
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=41812010
> 
> The vote is on version *11* of this document as displayed in the document
> page history at:
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpreviousversions.action?pageId=41812010
> 
> The page has been locked for edits.
> 
> To cast a vote, it is necessary to reply to this email, at
> 
>  [email protected]
> 
> with your vote as outlined under Section 3.3 of the Bylaws. As a
> reminder, for the purpose of tallying, all values will be counted as +1,
> -1 or nothing.
> 
> Per Section 3.3 of the Bylaws, this is a lazy 2/3 majority vote.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to