+1
On 04 Aug 2014, at 10:30 , Robert Samuel Newson <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > My preference to simplify some of the technical terms in the CoC do not > prevent me voting for the intent behind them, and I recognise that no list of > diversity axes can be complete. > > To those that don’t recognise race, congratulations! You are right, there’s > just one human race. At least for now, though, opposing racism as commonly > understood remains a moral imperative and one I’m happy to endorse. > > B. > > > On 4 Aug 2014, at 05:52, Joan Touzet <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Joan Touzet" <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Saturday, August 2, 2014 9:18:50 PM >> Subject: [VOTE] CouchDB Code of Conduct & Diversity Statement >> >> Voting period starts 03:00:00 UTC on Sunday, August 3, 2014 >> Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Sunday, August 10, 2014 >> >> >> INTRODUCTION >> ============ >> This Call For Votes is for voting in the official Apache CouchDB Code >> of Conduct and Diversity Statement. For voting questions or problems, >> contact the PMC at [email protected]. >> >> The intent is to make this an official document of Apache CouchDB. >> Once it becomes official, the text will be transferred into the SVN >> repository, and a link will be left on the wiki. >> >> To cast a binding vote, you need to be a CouchDB PMC member. Others are >> welcome to cast non-binding votes. >> >> >> HOW TO VOTE >> =========== >> First, read the full text of the proposal. >> >> The text of the bylaw document being voted on can be found at: >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=41812010 >> >> The vote is on version *11* of this document as displayed in the document >> page history at: >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpreviousversions.action?pageId=41812010 >> >> The page has been locked for edits. >> >> To cast a vote, it is necessary to reply to this email, at >> >> [email protected] >> >> with your vote as outlined under Section 3.3 of the Bylaws. As a >> reminder, for the purpose of tallying, all values will be counted as +1, >> -1 or nothing. >> >> Per Section 3.3 of the Bylaws, this is a lazy 2/3 majority vote. >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
