+1. On 26 Aug 2014, at 18:36 , Joan Touzet <[email protected]> wrote:
> In the interest of pushing this forward, let's move to a twice-a-month setup. > If we need to return to the skip-week, alternate-time arrangement, we can. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alexander Shorin" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 4:47:08 PM > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Changing CouchDB IRC meeting time > > History showed that there wasn't much activity at 9AM ET time and at > some moment I lost my possibility to run them at this time, but I'm +1 > if anyone can handle and run "early" meetings. Suddenly, still have to > constantly miss them. > > -- > ,,,^..^,,, > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Joan Touzet <[email protected]> wrote: >> Previously, we agreed as a group to alternating times for our weekly IRC >> meetings. Half of the weeks we would meet at 9AM ET / 2PM UK time, and the >> other half at 3PM ET / 8PM UK. >> >> I've noticed that for the weeks where we were supposed to be meeting at 9AM, >> the meetings aren't being held at all. By contrast, we hold most (but not >> all!) of the evening sessions on the alternate weeks. >> >> I want to keep things friendly for Europeans who don't want to stay up late, >> but evidence suggests we might just do best to move to a single time and >> hold meetings only every other week. >> >> If this were to happen, we'd cancel this week's IRC meeting (would be 9AM >> ET) and move to a twice-a-month setup, starting next week at the 3PM ET time. >> >> If there is any desire to revive the 9AM meetings, I'd rather let things >> stand - the intent of the meetings remains to involve as many people as >> possible. This proposal is simply to change the stated schedule to reflect >> reality. >> >> -Joan
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
