iirc there was the decision to bring the release on the road even though the OS X binaries had an issue. The last email I found was
http://markmail.org/search/?q=list%3Aorg.apache.couchdb-dev+1.6.1-rc4+binaries#query:list%3Aorg.apache.couchdb-dev%201.6.1-rc4%20binaries+page:1+mid:h4i7z2umsjjoooun+state:results So I think the process of bug-fixing did not happen here and no new binaries have been created after the problem report. So we need to fix this. But I am afraid that we need Jan, because he changed the process of creating them (way more easy and no offense to Jan) ... Cheers Andy On 10 September 2014 17:26, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello folks, > > I saw this today: > > https://twitter.com/wjhuie/status/508636819760906241 > > I see from the ML archives that Jan prepared the OS X binaries, but > there was an issue flagged with them. > > Why did we proceed with the public release before this was fixed? > > For clarification, I am not criticising Jan here, who is busy with JS > Conf. I think we should have had a conversation about halting the > release. > > Dave, what are your thoughts on this? > > Is someone able to prepare the OS X binaries? > > Thanks! > > -- > Noah Slater > https://twitter.com/nslater > > -- > <https://twitter.com/nslater> > Andy Wenk > Hamburg - Germany > RockIt! > > GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588 > > <https://twitter.com/nslater> > <https://twitter.com/nslater> > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc > >
