The old process will also still work, but the whole affair is fairly gnarly.
If you put the error message that was reported (Illegal instruction: 4) into a search engine, you will get a few hints for debugging. It should be easiest to get this set up with the new setup which you should be able to reverse engineer from https://github.com/janl/build-couchdb-mac/blob/master/build.sh (sorry, a readme is TBD, just uses homebrew and then does a few adjustments and packages things up). What I’m confused about is that the build was on Mac OS X 10.8 so 10.9 should just be supported, yet the error message suggests it is not while Eli says he’s on 10.9 and 64 bit, but I didn’t have time to look into this further. I’m also off with my JSConf EU duties until at least monday, so no promises from my end until then, but I didn’t want to leave you all in the dark until then. I’m sure between Andy and Dave at least you should be able to figure this out :) <3 Sorry to leave you “hanging” though! Best Jan -- On 10 Sep 2014, at 22:46 , Andy Wenk <[email protected]> wrote: > iirc there was the decision to bring the release on the road even though > the OS X binaries had an issue. The last email I found was > > http://markmail.org/search/?q=list%3Aorg.apache.couchdb-dev+1.6.1-rc4+binaries#query:list%3Aorg.apache.couchdb-dev%201.6.1-rc4%20binaries+page:1+mid:h4i7z2umsjjoooun+state:results > > So I think the process of bug-fixing did not happen here and no new > binaries have been created after the problem report. So we need to fix > this. But I am afraid that we need Jan, because he changed the process of > creating them (way more easy and no offense to Jan) ... > > Cheers > > Andy > > > On 10 September 2014 17:26, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello folks, >> >> I saw this today: >> >> https://twitter.com/wjhuie/status/508636819760906241 >> >> I see from the ML archives that Jan prepared the OS X binaries, but >> there was an issue flagged with them. >> >> Why did we proceed with the public release before this was fixed? >> >> For clarification, I am not criticising Jan here, who is busy with JS >> Conf. I think we should have had a conversation about halting the >> release. >> >> Dave, what are your thoughts on this? >> >> Is someone able to prepare the OS X binaries? >> >> Thanks! >> >> -- >> Noah Slater >> https://twitter.com/nslater >> >> -- >> <https://twitter.com/nslater> >> Andy Wenk >> Hamburg - Germany >> RockIt! >> >> GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588 >> >> <https://twitter.com/nslater> >> <https://twitter.com/nslater> >> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc >> >>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
