+1 to delete. I would rather limit the scope of CouchDB 2.0 and rather focus on getting the core out.
> On 10 Sep 2015, at 7:06 PM, Alexander Shorin <[email protected]> wrote: > > -1. We need to fix this, not drop. > -- > ,,,^..^,,, > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >> Oh, and I don’t know anyone who uses this. >> >> Best >> Jan >> -- >> >>> On 10 Sep 2015, at 18:18, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Heya all, >>> >>> I just had occasion to look into 2.0s oAuth support and it looks like >>> chttpd doesn’t ever talk to couch_httpd_oauth. >>> >>> In addition, oAuth in 1.x has only ever been half-baked (no automatic >>> handling of tokens among many other things), it is not maintained, and it >>> is barely documented. >>> >>> I propose to remove it from 2.0 and mark this as a breaking change. >>> >>> If not, we have to make 2.0 work with what we have, and we’ll have to have >>> somebody willing to do the work. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Best >>> Jan >>> -- >>> >> >> -- >> Professional Support for Apache CouchDB: >> http://www.neighbourhood.ie/couchdb-support/ >>
